top of page

Stripe Paintings

Writer's picture: Diamond ZhouDiamond Zhou

welcome to our

SATURDAY EVENING POST

January 18th, 2025



Stripe paintings, defined by their repetitive linear bands or stripes, have long been a visual and conceptual cornerstone in art. Their simplicity masks a rich history, engaging deeply with the concept and challenges of geometry, spatial perception, colour theory, and artistic intentionality. In the last century, stripe paintings have evolved, becoming a significant form in art, influencing movements from modernism to minimalism and beyond.


The origins of stripe paintings can be traced to human’s earliest decorative practices. Linear motifs appeared in ancient textiles, pottery, and architectural friezes, reflecting a universal attraction to rhythm, repetition, and order. The deliberate use of stripes as a dominant compositional element emerged significantly in the 20th century, influenced by modernist reductions of form and a growing emphasis on abstraction.


In the early 1900s, movements like Cubism and Futurism encouraged artists to deconstruct form and play with spatial relationships. While not strictly stripe paintings, works by Piet Mondrian anticipated this approach. Mondrian’s Composition with Red, Blue, and Yellow (1930) reveals a fascination with linear segmentation, its rhythmic balance and dynamic geometry foreshadowing the later emphasis on stripes in abstract art.



A painted pottery jar Majiayao culture, Majiayao phase, c. 3100-2700 B.C. 馬家窰文化 馬家窰類型 彩陶罐. Property from the Ronald W. Longsdorf Collection.

Piet Mondrian, Composition with Red, Blue, and Yellow, 1930, oil on canvas, 46 x 46 cm. Kunsthaus Zürich, Donated by Alfred Roth, 1987.

Barnett Newman, Vir Heroicus Sublimis, 1950-51, Oil on canvas, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Ben Heller. © 2025 Barnett Newman Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Barnett Newman, Voice of Fire, 1967, Acrylic on canvas, 543.6 x 243.8 cm. Copyright © 2025 National Gallery of Canada.

Bridget Riley. Photography by: Romano Cagnoni/Getty Images.

Bridget Riley, Over, 1966, Emulsion on board. 101.5 x 101.3 cm. Copyright © National Galleries of Scotland.


Bridget Riley's 'Cataract' series, created for the 1968 Venice Biennale where she won the International Prize for Painting, marked a vital evolution in her use of colour. Cataract 3 features coloured stripes on a white canvas, highlighting hue interactions and suggesting movement akin to light or water flow. The work contrasts with the fixed vision loss of an ophthalmological cataract by offering dynamic visual experiences through chromatic contrasts and rhythmic patterns. Influenced by artists like Monet and Cézanne, Riley emphasized visual surprise, employing assistants for a smooth finish while focusing on perceptual engagement. Her method balances ordered preparation with a free, vibrant result.



Bridget Riley, Catarat 3, 1967, Polyvinyl acetate on canvas, 87 3/8 × 87 3/4 in. (221.9 × 222.9 cm). British Council Collection.


Stripe paintings profoundly affect the viewer by structuring visual experience. The linear format creates a rhythmic flow, guiding the eye across the surface with a sense of movement akin to music. For instance, Barnett Newman’s zip paintings may invite a meditative stillness, while Bridget Riley’s vibrating stripes often disorient and challenge optical and spatial perception. The effect of stripes is not solely optical but also emotional, as the repetition and balance often create calm or dynamic energy.


This relationship between simplicity and complexity enhances viewer engagement. The tension within the uniformity of stripes, between order and variation, keeps the eye moving and the mind engaged, fostering prolonged contemplation. 


The creation of stripe paintings is as much about intentionality as it is about execution. While artists like Frank Stella emphasised precision, allowing mechanical regularity to dominate, others, like Sean Scully, embraced a more tactile, painterly approach that conveys emotional resonance through visible imperfections. These imperfections, whether in the form of uneven edges, variations in brushstrokes, or subtle inconsistencies in spacing, bear the unmistakable trace of the artist’s hand. In Scully’s works, for example, the softness of his lines and the layered application of paint create a sense of intimacy and humanity, drawing close, for the viewers, the relationship between artist and material. This contrasts sharply with Stella’s, or even Riley’s clinical precision, where the uniformity of the stripes removes the subjective mark of the artist in favour of an autonomous formalism.



Frank Stella, Die Fahne hock!, 1959, Enamel on canvas, © Frank Stella/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Whitney Museum of American Art, New York; gift of Mr. and Mrs. Eugene M. Schwartz and purchase with funds from the John I. H. Baur Purchase Fund, the Charles and Anita Blatt Fund, Peter M. Brant, B. H. Friedman, the Gilman Foundation, Inc., Susan Morse Hilles, The Lauder Foundation, Frances and Sydney Lewis, the Albert A. List Fund, Philip Morris Incorporated, Sandra Payson, Mr. and Mrs. Albrecht Saalfield, Mrs. Percy Uris, Warner Communications Inc., and the National Endowment for the Arts.

Sean Scully, Wall of Light, Red Summer, 2003, Oil on canvas, 191 x 216 cm. Lakeland Arts, Abbot Hall Art Gallery and Museum. © Sean Scully.


The individuality of a stripe painting often becomes immediately recognizable through the artist’s distinct use of colour and composition. For instance, Agnes Martin’s grids and stripes are defined by their muted palettes and subtle tonal variations, evoking serenity and introspection. Her meticulous craftsmanship, combined with the delicacy of her drawn lines, creates an almost meditative quality. On the other hand, Gene Davis’s vivid and contrasting stripes arranged in rhythmic sequences often generate a sense of playfulness and vibrancy, allowing his works to radiate energy.


Agnes Martin’s work transcend their apparent simplicity through a painstaking process of layering and refinement, where each line is imbued with intentionality and a sense of conviction. Her lines, while straight, are not mechanical, as their faint irregularities draw the viewer into the intimacy of her process, where subtle imperfections act as traces of human presence.


In an oddly similar way, Daniel Buren’s deliberate deployment of stripes not only reflects conceptual rigour but also invites viewers to question the institutional and spatial contexts in which the work exists. His stripes, often presented in public or site-specific installations, gain meaning through their interaction with their environment, challenging conventional ideas about art’s place and function.



Agnes Martin, Untitled #5, 1988, Acrylic paint and graphite on linen, 72 in. × 72 in. (182.88 cm × 182.88). The Doris and Donald Fisher Collection at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. © Estate of Agnes Martin / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Gene Davis, Black Rhythm, c. 1964, Acrylic on canvas. Purchased from Vincent Melzac, Collection of the CIA.

Gene Davis, Black Grey Beat, 1964 SAAM, gift from the Vincent Melzac Collection.

Daniel Buren, Les Deux Plateaux, 1985-86, Palais-Royal, Paris. Image: imageBROKER.com GmbH & Co. KG / Alamy Stock Photo, Artwork: © ADAGP, Paris and DACS, London 2023.

Les Deux Plateaux, more commonly known as the Colonnes de Buren, is an art installation created by the French artist Daniel Buren in 1985–1986. It is located in the inner courtyard (Cour d'Honneur) of the Palais Royal in Paris, France.





Stripe paintings occupy a crucial position in art history, bridging modernism’s emphasis on reduction with postmodernism’s interrogation of perception and context. Their adaptability allowed them to influence diverse movements, from Abstract Expressionism to Minimalism and Op Art. The reductive geometry of stripe paintings aligns with modernism’s quest for purity, while their optical effects resonate with postmodern explorations of viewer interaction.


Beyond aesthetics, stripe paintings challenge the traditional hierarchies of art and design by deliberately navigating the space between functional simplicity and high conceptual thought. Their reliance on formal simplicity invites comparisons with decorative arts, challenging conventional distinctions and redefining the scope of artistic discourse.


This blurring of boundaries positions stripe paintings not merely as autonomous artworks but also as reflections of cultural, historical, and philosophical contexts. The precision or imperfection of their linear forms highlights the tension between craftsmanship and mechanical repetition, drawing attention to the artist’s intentionality in balancing the visual appeal of pattern with deeper conceptual undertones.



Ellsworth Kelly, Spectrum V, 1969, Each panel: 84 1/8" x 34" x 1 1/8". The Metropolitan Museum of Art. © Ellsworth Kelly Foundation.

Installation view of Dan Flavin, Untitled, 1996, at Richmond Hall, The Menil Collection, Houston. Photography by: Sarah Hobson.

Donald Judd, Untitled 1990. © Estate of Donald Judd /VAGA, New York/DACS, London 2025.

Kenneth Noland, New Day, 1967, Acrylic on canvas, Overall: 89 3/8 × 184 1/4in. (227 × 468 cm). Whitney Museum of American Art, New York; purchase, with funds from the Friends of the Whitney Museum of American Art. © Estate of Kenneth Noland / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Gerhard Richter, (927-7) Strip, 2012, Digitaler Druck montiert zwischen Aluminium und Perspex, 210 x 230 cm.

Gerhard Richter, (926-1) Strip, 2012, Digital print on paper between Alu Dibond and Perspex (Diasec), 105 cm x 105 cm.



Stripe paintings emphasise materiality and process, engaging with profound philosophical questions about the essence of painting. By distilling visual elements to their most fundamental components—colour, line, and rhythm, stripe paintings put emphasis on the flatness of the canvas and the importance of its autonomy as an object. At the same time, the repetitive and often meditative process of creating stripes resonates with broader themes in contemporary art of temporality, labour, and human presence.



Mark Rothko, No. 14, 1960, 1960, Oil on canvas, 114 1/2 in. × 105 5/8 in. (290.83 cm × 268.29 cm). Collection SFMOMA, Helen Crocker Russell Fund purchase. Copyright © 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

Installation view: Mark Rothko, Gallery 9, Floor 2, Fondation Louis Vuitton, Paris, 2023–24. Left to right: Mark Rothko, Untitled, 1960, Blue, Orange, Red, 1961, No. 14, 1960. © 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko - Adagp, Paris, 2023.

Sol LeWitt (American, 1928–2007). Wall Drawing #370: Ten Geometric Figures (including right triangle, cross, X, diamond) with three-inch parallel bands of lines in two directions, 1982. India ink on a wall. Dimensions vary with installation. The loan of Wall Drawing #370 is courtesy of The Estate of Sol LeWitt. The installation is made possible by The Modern Circle.

Time-Lapse: Installation of Sol LeWitt at The Met, Days 11-14.

Redrawing Sol LeWitt's Wall Drawing #1211 at MASS MoCa.

Sol Lewitt, Horizontal Colour Bands and Vertical Colour Bands, Plate 06, 1991, Etching with acquaint, 17.4 x 34.9 in. Please inquire for availability.

Daniel Mullen, So Long, 2018, Acrylic on linen, 71 x 59 in. Please inquire for availability.

Alexander Jowett, Arenas Rosadas, 2024, Acrylic and pint pen on canvas over wood, 60 x 60 in. Please inquire for availability.

Ross Bleckner, Unknown Quantities of Light (Part IV), 1988, oil on canvas, 108 x 144 in. (274.32 x 365.76 cm). © Ross Bleckner.

from The Broad, UP CLOSE: Ross Bleckner.

Morris Louis, Number 182, 1961, Acrylic on canvas, 82 1/4 x 33 1/4 in.; 208.915 x 84.455 cm. ©2025 The Phillips Collection.

Morris Louis, Alpha Phi, 1960-1961, 102 x 180 1/2 in. (259.1 x 458.5 cm), Acrylic resin (Magna) on canvas. Copyright © 2014 MICA. Rights administered by Artists Rights Society (ARS).

Carmen Herrera, Untitled, 1952, Acrylic on canvas, 25 x 60" (63.5 x 152.4 cm). Gift of Agnes Gund and Tony Bechara. Copyright © Estate of Carmen Herrera.


“To make this work, Herrera painted vertical bands of black and white at varying lengths and with diagonal breaks that create a two-tone zigzag pattern. She extended her pattern to the face and sides of the frame, giving the object a sense of dynamic totality. 'I began a lifelong process of purification, a process of taking away what isn't essential,’ she explained. Although active in Paris and New York from the late 1940s on, she did not sell a painting until 2004, at the age of eighty-nine. She has recalled that one dealer bluntly told her, ‘You can paint circles around the male artists that I have, but I'm not going to give you a show because you're a woman.’”


— Gallery label from Making Space: Women Artists and Postwar Abstraction,

April 19 - August 13, 2017



Ian Davenport, Mirrored Blue Light No.2 (after Perugino), 2023, Acrylic on aluminium panels (with additional floor sections), 98 3/8 x 59 in, 250 x 150 cm. Copyright © 2025 Waddington Custot.

Guido Molinari, Mutation bi-sérielle grise, 1966-1967, Acrylic on canvas, 173 x 127 cm.  © Musee National Des Beaux-Arts de Quebec.

Jack Bush, Down + Across, 1967, Acrylic polymer W.B. on canvas, 58.5 x 50 in. Photography by: Michael Visser. Image © Estate of Jack Bush/Cova-Daav.

Joseph Kyle, Synoptica #29, 2002, Acrylic on canvas, 60 x 42 in. © Paul Kyle Gallery. Please inquire for availability.

Joseph Kyle, Synoptica #40, 2002, Acrylic on canvas, 48 x 36 in. © Paul Kyle Gallery. Please inquire for availability.

 

We are proud to announce our upcoming exhibition


JACK BUSH: FLAUNTING THE RULES


Opening: Saturday, February 1st, 2025

1:00 - 5:30 PM


Catalogue available, with essay by Roald Nasgaard


Photograph of Jack Bush at the David Mirvish Gallery, 1975. Photography by: Reg Innell. From the Toronto Star Photograph Archive. Courtesy of the Toronto Star. © Toronto Star (Firm).



A message from our Insurance Sponsor for this exhibition:

At Acera Insurance, we’ve been serving the fine arts community for decades. Partnering with the world’s leading insurers, our advisors provide comprehensive, customized solutions to protect your valuable collections.


Contact: Farzina Coladon

bottom of page